PILOT STUDY EXAMINING FEASIBILITY AND COMPARING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DECISION AIDS FOR HIP AND KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS: A RANDOMIZED TRIAL

Pilot Study Examining Feasibility and Comparing the Effectiveness of Decision Aids for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Trial

Pilot Study Examining Feasibility and Comparing the Effectiveness of Decision Aids for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Trial

Blog Article

Background.There are many patient decision aids (DAs) available, yet there is limited evidence on comparative effectiveness of different tools.Objective.

To examine feasibility of a study protocol and gather preliminary data on comparative effectiveness.Methods.Adult patients seeing a surgeon to discuss treatment for hip or knee osteoarthritis were randomized to hip and knee DAs from two vendors.

Pre-visit survey included Hip/Knee Decision Quality Instrument, DA usage, health literacy, and quality of life (EQ-5D).Surgical status was ascertained 6 months post-visit.We examined response rates, eligibility, and compared the two DAs on amount of use, knowledge scores, and receipt of Queen Upholstered Bed preferred treatment.

Results.Overall response rate was 58/74 (78%) and did not differ by study arm.More patients in DA-A group reported reviewing all the DAs (64.

5% DA-A v.24.0% DA-B, P = 0.

003).Knowledge scores were similar across arms (55.2% DA-A v.

48.8% DA-B, P = 0.4).

For DA-B, knowledge scores Face Mirrors were higher for those who reviewed all the DAs compared with those who did not (80% knowledge v.39% knowledge, respectively, P = 0.004), while scores for DA-A did not vary by usage (62% knowledge v.

53% knowledge, respectively, P = 0.3).A similar percentage of each group received their preferred treatment (77% v.

73%, P = 0.8).Patients who were unsure about preferred treatment at baseline were more likely to have surgery in the DA-A arm compared with the DA-B arm (55% v.

20%, P = 0.1).Limitations.

Small sample; patients were only surveyed pre-visit.Conclusion.Despite having different content and formats, the two DAs had similar overall effectiveness.

Patients were more likely to review all of DA-A; however, patients who reviewed all of DA-B had the highest knowledge scores.

Report this page